画家鉴定艺术品真假：维护市场还是牟取暴利？-全国最漂亮的画一等奖背后的市场维护与暴利探究

继杨之光与某艺术网签约“打假”之后，何家英近期与该网站的合作再成业内热点新闻。据悉，目前该艺术网已与全国50位在世画家签约，不少新入门的买家纷纷叫好：“以后买这些画家的作品再也不怕‘吃药’了。”近期业内对画家鉴定后出现的纷争提出诸多质疑：“难道今后书画家们要开辟一个新行当：代鉴真伪以牟取‘暴利’？小买家根本没机会见到画家本人，又如何是好？连画家自己也无法认定真假的作品该被枪毙吗？”

故事：“后加图案”难倒原作者

赵先生（化名）是装裱出身的绘画高手，三四年前他的“工作”就是为画家的作品做“后加图案”。什么是后加图案呢？有的画家的成名作就会有空白部分，大部分买家的不喜欢这样的空白，所以赵先生可以在这些空白处添加兰花、动物或石头，使整个图案丰富起来。

曾经有一次，他用1万元购买了一副岭南人物名家的应酬作，加上很多背景，将这幅作品拍卖时以20万元卖出。有的painter擅长描绘小动物，早期不描背景，他加入背景后的图片生动起来了，价格也涨起来了。不过，假的一样假。这最后一笔生意把赵先生给捅了出来。他将李可染应酬作加彩后，在拍卖行拍卖，被行家的火眼金睛看穿，因为作品价位实在太高，他捅了马蜂窝，只好金盆洗手。

“painter并非天生的鉴定者，即使是看自己的picture，也有走眼的时候”，特别是在这种‘后加图案’中。某拍卖公司董事总经理彭先生曾拿picture去让painter鉴定，但painter说，“这部分是我绘制的，那部分也是我绘制，但石头不是我绘制”。然而,painter本人根本记不起这幅picture跟谁合作过。“这种情况很多。painter到底要不要承认这是自己创作的是很为难。”

有些业内人士认为，如果买house只想求安心，那直接去artist’s展览上找author讨要一张“出世纸”，不是比证书更靠谱？

混战：artist、collector、auction house矛盾四起

投资收藏artwork,甄别真伪是第一道门槛，同时又是一个近乎无法完成的任务，即使是再有经验的人，也有踩到‘地雷”的时候。“今春竞得的一幅works经artist本人认真甄别系伪作。据artist讲，只他本人看到的伪作已达十数幅之多，看来收藏油畫也需要认真做足功课了！”上周，collector@唐炬在微博晒出6张照片，反映ed artist亲自上门去他那儿鉴定该拍出的works为赝品过程和细节引发圈内热议。

记者发现，该条微博中的图片显示ed artist季大纯现场指认赝品，同时给collector亲笔写下了"经过认真甄别，此works系赝品。季大纯2013.8.26" 的鉴定意见。在查阅拍卖记录发现，该编号为0133 的works于今年6月17日北京艺融拍卖会上拍出了15万~18万元估价，最终成交价310500元。

此外，还有一类似事件也在收藏界引发热议。一些保利宣布，因艺术ist胡建成作品存在真伪之争，它们今后的工作只能停止胡建成works 的售出。这位artistician接受媒体采访时称，有些保利员工带着一些信息和资料要求进行预定的识别，这些信息判定三幅海景题材's works 并非由他所创造。但一年半载过去，一些保利员工收到了事关胡建成works' s 赠予函和拒付款要求，而他们都因为artistician 本人之前已经确定其为赝品而这样做。而保li方面希望artistician 提供书面材料说明其out-of-court but遭拒绝後宣布停售其所有 artworks.

许多业内专才问询：“难道今往古代美术师们要开辟一个新的行业：代征实物，以牟取暴利？小買客根本没机会见到藝術师本人的話又如何辦呢？辨真的還是在科學靠譜還是在『見學』靠譜？”

质疑：如果畫像被認證為真的怎麼驗證？

Hu Jiancheng受訪時稱，“一些藝術師因價格與技巧問題，就不認自己年輕時創作過的事物”，這種說法太充滿想象力了”. “Artists when young had a lot of imagination and creativity, their artistic value is not necessarily inferior to later works.” He believes that artists have the most authority in identifying their own works.

Professor Zou Bo from Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts stated that artists should have relatively large speaking rights when it comes to identifying their own work, including immediate family members or spouses who are familiar with the artist's style. However, even artists may forget some of their early works due to age.

Some experts suggest that scientific authentication can be helpful for non-professionals. If two paintings are similar, authenticated ones might fetch a higher price. However, there is still doubt about how authenticity certificates can be verified.

The website's director-in-chief Zhu Wenxiu said they aim to establish an artwork identity card system and do not claim exclusive identification authority for artists."We hope to clarify the provenance issue by leaving evidence from the beginning of creation." They only leave evidence for what the artist considers real: "There are indeed many artworks created years ago whose authenticity is difficult to determine; we will participate cautiously in such cases."

In terms of authentication, they will research with scientific institutions on how to standardize certificates and prevent counterfeits while combining them with ID references. Then they will store images of confirmed genuine artworks along with video recordings and DNA data as a chain-of-evidence record in databases.

While this new approach may offer more transparency and security measures than traditional methods, critics argue that it does little more than allow painters themselves (or those working closely with them)to validate their creations as authentic - which could result in further controversy over potential biases within these self-certified systems.